Subject	I got to that point, decided to replace all the broken NA
Posted by	Red Hawk (CO) on June 26, 2012 at 3:48 PM
	This message has been viewed 167 times.
In Reply To	All else equal, an NA will be cheaper to maintain, no doubt. posted by zellamay on June 26, 2012 at 03:43 PM
Message	parts with TT parts in preparation for a slick top TT conversion lol Regardless however, I would probably venture to say a TT has a slightly shorter lifespan, my NA (and others I have heard ) went 270,000 with only the average 60,000 mile maintainance done ( 4 times of course :) I dont know of too many TTs lasting that many miles, but pretty close i would bet! TT BEAST IN PROGRESS!
Follow Ups	TT vs. NA Reliability - ZRoTTyZ 13:34:22 06/26/12 100% depends on the individual car at this point. (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 13:41:13 06/26/12 Re: 100% depends on the individual owner care. (n/m) - njz 14:05:32 06/26/12 All else equal, an NA will be cheaper to maintain, no doubt. - zellamay 15:43:30 06/26/12 I got to that point, decided to replace all the broken NA - Red Hawk (CO) 15:48:20 06/26/12 My NA was stolen around 8 years ago... - CameronSF 15:55:39 06/26/12 I've always wondered what happens to stolen Z's... - samsung-Z [Houston] 20:15:52 06/26/12 It all comes down to maintenance - RobZ32 10:46:07 06/27/12 Funny with stolen Z's - KA8 13:14:33 06/28/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.